Monday 2 October 2017

Modern Djing Is Better With Manual Servicing



Day by day the advancement of technology is getting bettered. Now a days softwares have almost taken places of djing style and its performing better than the traditional somehow. It's good and its a known status of act. There's not much to bother about it. Currently the technical sides of djing i.e beat matching, mixing, looping, composing...are mostly done by a software outsourced to computer. Then why beatmatching, mixing etc..are called skills? The reliable fact is that skill belongs to human and software belongs to computerized devices. Though it seems virtually impossible to inculcate skill into the brain of computer but considering the healthy goodness of this electronic generation there's a lot to develop in computers for the futuristic peachiness.

Dj sets are not fixed and track selection changes from venue to venue. Different crowd influences different cities, festivals, nightlife. How a computer can well be adjusted with this versatility in djing? Computer acts according to commands. In a festival there will be thousands of commands. Can a computer remember all the commands at a time? Can a computer react to the emotionality of crowd? You cannot expect a particular one scene in djing. It will change inconsistently and its not possible for computer to set a new standard every while. While to maintain the computer programming here an IT specialist required more than a dj, because its all about programming, not music. It's more as a task not as a play.

Some people may think about automix here. But automix cannot serve upto our interest and its just a controlled force of what a particular computer thinks. If computers are developed with the flexibility of crowd choices then at least 70% problems in modern djing would be solved. Again when a dj is playing his/her set from crowd prospective he/she has to be active by ears/mind. Catching the attraction of crowd is not easy as easy as it feels to say. It takes a longtime to develop this skill and by playing a lot of sessions somehow its helpful to understand the crowd from a live impact.

Some may even think about developing a crowd feedback system by which a person can show his/her like or dislike for a particular track. Isn't its too stressful. May it seems to be an easygoing in initial stage but as a real clubber one going to feel heck as a clubber to do it continuously. Clubbers want to feel the tune, music they are there for enjoyment not to perform tasks. More or less this activity will seem like a task and its not good in long run. The clubbers emotion will tell all the things which track is peaky and which one feels down. Accordingly the dj changes the track simultaneously with the nonverbal clue. This is where a dj can setup the tone, which computer can't do.

Computers can match genre, tempo, up and down pitches of sound, recording limitless data, but it can’t control the change of data sequence which djs now a days do. Being the centre of concept, a dj understands the culture out there in a live mode and he/she manages the up and down of pitches, and change of track selection. Being a well known divine listener of music a dj is there in the club/festival to perform for his crowd for a particular time and creating a musical journey with the evolvement of moods and involvement of emotion on behalf of the partygoers or dance groovers. The root of dj culture is nothing but a collective performance of an equality of respect between the crowd and dj. It's possible with the help of good understanding, not a peach programming.